

However, with Fire Strike Extreme, the stronger graphics compute capabilities of the GTX 760 allowed it to pull ahead of the GTX 660 Ti. The performance of the GTX 760 here, was more in-line with the results of 3DMark 2013 benchmark, whereby it was beaten by the GTX 660 Ti at lower settings. It also utilizes dynamic sky effects, volumetric clouds, sun shafts, DOF, and ambient occlusion.

This powerful tool can be effectively used to determine the stability of a GPU under extremely stressful conditions, as well as check the cooling system's potential under maximum heat output. Unigine's Valley benchmark renders a highly detailed seamless landscape, which covers a total land area of 64,000 square kilometers. Heaven Benchmark with its current version 4.0 is a GPU-intensive benchmark that hammers graphics cards to the limits. Other than that, the GTX 760 performed as within expectations, while the GTX 670 maintained its winning margins, between 15- 17 per cent, over the GTX 760, at the same settings. With anti-aliasing set at 8x, and at the highest resolution of 2560 x 1600, the GTX 760 was outclassed by the AMD Radeon HD 7950, by a margin of less than a single frame per second. However, its lead over them, especially its NVIDIA counterpart, was very thin. The latest version of Unigine’s longstanding “Heaven” benchmark tests GPUs with extreme tessellation, dynamic sky with volumetric clouds, real-time global illumination, and screen-space ambient occlusion among others.Īt both screen resolutions, with anti-aliasing disabled, the GTX 760 was able to maintain its lead over the GTX 660 Ti and the AMD Radeon HD cards. Last edited: Panchovix Joined Messages 41 (0.
#Unigine heaven benchmark 4.0 results 1080p
As fast as I care to run things, results for 1080p and 1440p. Unigine 4.0 "Heaven" and Unigine "Valley" 1.0 Results Unigine 4.0 "Heaven" Results 34 37 Next oobymach Joined Messages 1,167 (0.85/day) Location Canada System Specs 776 Re did bench, didn't notice others did with 8xAA so I'm correcting that.
